Hospitals are seeing clearer returns when they apply digital tools to routine back‑office tasks, according to recent industry analysis.
Targeted use of technology drives measurable gains
Analysts note that the most successful investments focus on administrative functions where productivity improvements can be quantified. Saleem Butt, a principal for healthcare services in Southeast Asia at L.E.K. Consulting, said the strongest use cases have a clearly defined baseline, measurable outcomes, and an implementation pathway that fits existing workflows.
Data from a May report shows that 57 % of healthcare organisations are only breaking even on tech spending, hampered by poor data quality, cybersecurity concerns, regulatory compliance and weak governance. Butt urged providers to start by pinpointing the operational or clinical problem they intend to solve, rather than adopting technology without a clear purpose.
Related: CMUH robot priced below nursing costs
In Indonesia, digital billing and coding systems used to process claims to BPJS Kesehatan illustrate the point. The tools reduce administrative workload, cut coding errors and speed up reimbursements, Butt explained. He added that implementation costs—such as system integration, governance, staff training and ongoing monitoring—must be factored into any business case.
Rohit Anand, director of research and analysis for medical devices at GlobalData, highlighted documentation, scheduling, coding, prior authorisation, patient communication and revenue‑cycle management as the administrative areas delivering the clearest business benefits. These functions reduce repetitive work and make productivity improvements easier to measure.
He also warned that tech projects succeed when they are woven into existing workflows and local payment systems, rather than launched as isolated initiatives.
Related: Chickenpox outbreak hits Gaza refugee camps
Governance and data quality remain critical
Huma Naz, director of outpatient services at Pakistan’s Aga Khan University Hospital, stressed that organisations should define the problem technology is meant to address before selecting a solution. Clinicians and other stakeholders need to stay involved throughout implementation and improvements should be measured in patient outcomes, operational efficiency and quality of care.
High‑quality data is a fundamental requirement because inaccurate or incomplete information can undermine decision‑making. Naz added that cybersecurity, privacy protection and regulatory compliance must be built into projects from the outset rather than treated as afterthoughts.
Stephen Sunderland, a partner and head of Southeast Asia healthcare at L.E.K., argued providers should not wait for perfect data before expanding technology programmes. Instead, they should focus on controlling data access and ensuring reliable outputs, especially where inaccurate information could affect patient care.